I heard that the change was effective from January 2013 as well.
moggy lover
JoinedPosts by moggy lover
-
-
-
75
The Society debunked the rumored new light on the F&DS in 1973
by Leolaia inthis is the summary of the rumored new light from the 2012 annual meeting, as posted by cedars.. the faithful and discreet slave was not appointed at pentecost 33ce, meaning that there has not been a continuous line of members of the slave class on the earth down through the ages.
the slave class was only appointed for the first time by christ in 1919.the faithful and discreet slave is a small group of anointed brothers during jesus presence serving at watchtower headquarters who are directly involved in the preparing and dispensing of spiritual food.
the individual members of the governing body are not the faithful and discreet slave.
-
moggy lover
I suppose one of the problems that the Watchtower leadership has solved with the the first century FDS is the role of women in this supposed group.
Let's "reason" like this:
All first century Christians were anointed, thus they all in some capacity or other served as the FDS.
ALL Christians?
Does this include women?
If women served on the FDS in the first century, did this mean that they went from d-t-d, especially if their husbands were not Christians? This is most unlikely given that unaccompanied women calling uninvited at someone's home would have suggested something other than soliciting for God!! All Watchtower illustrations showing the FDS/GB always portray men. And the first century d-t-d work is also an exclusive male domain.
If women served on the FDS in the first century, did they participate in preparing the spiritual food? Women??? Teaching men?? And in the first century??
If they did not participate in preparing the spiritual meals, then what role DID they play? Something meaningless probably.
Now the Leadership don't need to contemplate an answer for this conundrum.
It may not be relevant but it is the way my warped mind turns.
-
56
Does the Watchtower really parallel 1st Century Christianity?
by Emery ini wanted to get a list of arguments that illustrate how the watchtower society is or isn't following 1st century christianity today.
thanks again everyone!.
-
moggy lover
It would be extremely naive for anyone to deny that the Watchtower does have a clergy class. This is understandable since the rank and file are persistently mesmerized into believing that they do not. However, although the rank and file deny it, the Watchtower leadership THEMSELVES admit that they do have a clergy. Should anyone fall foul of the leadership and has need to sue them, he will promptly be told that "clergy priviledge" protects all Watchtower Followers who are professionally inducted into the movement. If you earn your living, no matter how much of a pittance, from the coffers of the Watchtower, you are regarded by the Watchtower as a member of its clergy.
It is also impossible to "prove" that first century Christianity was led by a secretive, largely anonymous group of self serving men called a "Governing Body". The expression is found nowhere in the NT, and considering the fact that Paul had so many clashes with them, the possiblity is reduced to pure fiction. The text that the Watchtower suggests as a prop for this doctrine, Heb 13:7 [especially as a ritualized footnote in the Bible with References edition] wasn't written until about 65-69 AD, almost a generation after the start of the Christian Church in 30 AD. What did the early Christians do till then? How could they endure a doctrine of a "Governing Body" before it had actually been revealed?
If the early Christians had a "Faithful and Discreet Slave" class BEFORE 70 AD, when the first fulfillment of Matt 24 was to take place, then who were they? Were they ALL "anointed" Christians? Women were as "anointed" as men back in the first century, weren't they? So, did the FDS include women who supplied this "food at the proper time" thus effectively teaching other Christian believers? Did Christian women go from door-to-door back in the first centiury? This would be particularly strange given that women NEVER called privately on anyone, unless of course they were soliciting business of a questionable kind!! Note that EVERY illustration that the anonymous Watchtower writers provide, shows MEN only doing this activity.
It would be difficult to show that first century Christians met in "Kingdom Halls", when the NT indicates that they met regularly in private homes. There is certaily no evidence to show that they observed the "memorial" of Christ's death only once a year. Indeed their approach to this was to observe His Resurrection as a living Saviour, not His death.
On balance it must be added that every cult believes it, and it alone, is the exclusive inheritor of the first century Christian legacy, and all make the same grotesque claims that the Watchtower does. Some claim that the early Christians spoke in tongues so modern Christians should do so, which then becomes a mark of exclusivity. Some claim that Sabbath observance was a vital link in the chain, others that the keeping of the original Jewish feasts such as Passover, Tabernacles, and so on, were symptoms of this continuity, and on and on it goes.
-
10
How's do jws explain Genesis 35:18
by loosie ingenesis 35:18 (new world translation).
.and the result was that as her soul[a] was going out (because she died) she called his name benoni; but his father called him benjamin.. .
.. i never asked them and now i can't .
-
moggy lover
I think the trick lies in the way Freddy Franz used, rather than "translated" the Hebrew word "yatsah" which occurs here. The word in its broadest sense means "to depart", that is, to leave one area and to transfer to another. That Franz knew the meaning of this word is evident from the way he "translated" such verses as Ex 16:1. Here, as in other verses, he used the word "depart".
But at Gen 35:18, the translation used was ambiguous enough to mean something rather different from an actual transfer from one place to another. In using "going out" as his preferred option, Franz allowed for a conclusion that more aptly referred to a light bulb, rather a departing to another location. When one turns a light off, or as someone mentioned above, blows a candle out, it "goes out" thus implying an "extinguishing" rather than a "departing". That is what Franz conveniently suggested Gen 35:18 meant.
In many ways, Franz used the notion of the NW"T" as being a literal translation to create a version that could, in many verses that are awkward to Watchtower theology, be so excruciatingly literal as to be totally unintelligible.
-
-
moggy lover
Well....I stand when I pee, so I must be male!
-
71
12/15/12 Watchower Study Edition - Higher Eduction = Thinking in a "complicated" manner
by yourmomma ini found this quote from the 12/15/12 p.29 study edition of the watchtower to be hilarious:.
"a college graduate in the united states.
says: i spent 18 years speaking and writing.
-
moggy lover
I can't seem to find this magazine on the web. It certainly is not available on the Watchtower.org site. Is there another web site that publishes current Watchtower literature?
-
7
Is KIT 1 or 2 available in any language other than English?
by moggy lover indoes anyone know for a fact whether the wts released any foreign language editions of either kit 1 or 2?.
such as french or german or spanish?.
-
moggy lover
Does anyone know for a fact whether the WTS released any foreign language editions of either KIT 1 or 2?
Such as French or German or Spanish?
-
22
HEAR YE! HEAR YE! ADVENTISTS' GROWTH RATE IN BRAZIL OUTSTRIPS JWS'
by steve2 injoker10 started a thread some days ago - putatively just to "inform" us - about the growth of self-identifying jehovahs witnesses in brazil across two census periods, the year 2000 to the year 2010. this led to some enlivened discussion about growth rates, including in particular how this compared with other similar 'vintage' 'christianized' religions such as the mormons (latter-day saints of the church of jesus christ) and seventh-day adventists (sdas).
joker10 readily obliged by posting within the same day the relevant growth rates for the latter-day saints in brazil over the same census periods.
the jw growth rate easily outstripped those for the latter-day saints.
-
moggy lover
Cedars:
I got my stats from the official SDA web page: www.adventist.org/world-church/facts-and figures/index/html
To treat the growth/decline in the USA I tried to be objective by reading both the following sites, the first is positive, the second negative:
1. http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-03-08-Adventists 17 ST N.htm
2. "Future trends in the SDA Church": by Tom Norris at:
all.experts.com/q/Seventh-Day-Adventists-213/2011
steve2: Thanks, mate.
SBF: Yes that is true. However, I was more interested in presenting the medical mission field that the SDAs run because of my familiarity with it. But it is true that they are big on education. I did see the number of these they maintain world wide but did not record it. I know they do run a university site in Avondale, New South Wales, here in Aussie, that teaches up to post graduate level in most disciplines of study.
Incidently, I appear to have goofed in one area. Under number 4, the number of hospitals and sanitariums run by the SDAs worldwide, the number is actually 173, not 137.
-
22
HEAR YE! HEAR YE! ADVENTISTS' GROWTH RATE IN BRAZIL OUTSTRIPS JWS'
by steve2 injoker10 started a thread some days ago - putatively just to "inform" us - about the growth of self-identifying jehovahs witnesses in brazil across two census periods, the year 2000 to the year 2010. this led to some enlivened discussion about growth rates, including in particular how this compared with other similar 'vintage' 'christianized' religions such as the mormons (latter-day saints of the church of jesus christ) and seventh-day adventists (sdas).
joker10 readily obliged by posting within the same day the relevant growth rates for the latter-day saints in brazil over the same census periods.
the jw growth rate easily outstripped those for the latter-day saints.
-
moggy lover
While we are on the subject I thought I might share some recent research I did in comparing the evangelistic outreach of both, the SDAs and the WTS.
1. Number of Lands Operating in:
WTS: 237
SDA: 207
At first glance it might appear that the WTS has a wider outreach than the SDAs, until we recall that Cedars recently posted a chart showing how, in 30 unnamed lands the WTS presence was either minimal, or outright fictional. Subtracting this figure leaves both groups operating in the same battleground, and they are competing for market share in largely the same market.
2. Languages used in Publishing:
WTS: 197
SDA:: 377
Obviously the outreach here is much more weighted in the SDA favour. It appears that they take their responsibilities in this matter more seriously than the WTS
3. Charitable Outreach:
WTS: None
SDA: ADRA
ADRA is the name for the worldwide charity legally established by the SDAs and operating internationally. It stands for Adventist Development and Relief Agency.
4. Health Care for the Poor:
WTS: None
SDA: 137 Hospitals worldwide
When I lived in India where I was born of mixed British Indian parentage, and where I pioneered as a Wt Follower in the 60s and 70, doing absolutely nothing for the people, the SDAs were building the first cancer hospital in Inda at Chennai [Madras]. Named the Ira B Scudder Cancer Hospital it was gifted to the people of India forever, to be used to provide moderately priced health care for the poor.
5. Income from Membership:
WTS: Closely guarded secret, believed to be declining
SDA: 2.2 Billion Dollars
This large figure can be accounted for in the SDA group because they exact a tithe from the membership.
6. Charity Payouts:
WTS: None.
SDA: 2.2 Million Dollars
If there are any charitable contributions made in the WTS, these are from the membership at large, and never from the closely guarded coffers of the leadership. Also, any such charity is largely in-house rather than for outsiders. As one can see, the SDA leadership at least tries to live up to its creed. Approximately a tithe of offerings given to them goes to charitable outreach.
7. Worldwide Membership:
WTS: 7.2. Million
SDA: 17.3 Million
Both figures are approximate and are both taken from the official web sites.
5. India Figures:
WTS :32,000
SDA: 900,000
Both figures, are again approximate.
6. India Baptisms:
WTS: 2,000
SDA: 25,000
7.Worldwide baptisms:
WTS 300,000
SDA: 1.1 Million
Again the figures will vary yearly, and are approximate.
Both groups seem to be in decline in the same areas, ie, the developed world, but for different reasons. As far as the WTS is concerned, this decline appears to be related to the rise of Internet usage which exposes some of the more outlandish claims made by the largely secretive leadership.
In the case of the SDAs, it appears that their Church is undergoing a sharp identity crises along with, in North America at least, bad managment. The theological debates regarding dependance on Ellen White and the works/salvation area refuse to go away, and while the Church Leadership continues to decline any genuine attempt at reconciling this division, defections are continuing at an increasing rate. There are now more SDAs in India than there are in the USA!
Are the SDAs more culturally diverse and internationally spread than the WTS? No figures are available from the WTS, but SDA figures are:
African Membership: 37%
Hispanic Membership: 30%
East Asian Membership: 14%
Caucasian Membership: 11%
Others: 6%
-
2
Has the GB ever admitted that Jehovah has an invisible body?
by moggy lover inthis is a natural consequence of the watchtower position that their god is in a finite location in some corner of the sky.
if he is locative and in a specific place, does this mean that he has, in some sort of sense a "body"?
thus, like the mormons who believe that the "father" has a literal and physical body made of flesh and bone, does tha watchtower also believe that their deity too, has a body, albeit an invisible, "spirit" one?.
-
moggy lover
WOW! You came through, Blondie!
That's what I was looking for!